Chapter Seven: The democratic subsidy in Namibia’s intelligence oversight mechanisms
Synopsis
Democratic societies require and thrive on a significant degree of openness, the rule of law and accountability of public officials and institutions, inter alia. In a democracy, powerful individuals and institutions are made accountable for their decisions and actions mainly through formal and informal oversight mechanisms. Formal oversight structures are embedded within a state’s infrastructure in terms of the law and are financially capacitated to make their operations possible. However, the secretive and sometimes invasive nature of intelligence operations often places them beyond the reach of effective formal oversight mechanisms, making the former a real potential threat to the democratic fabric of the societies they serve.
It is in this context that the chapter uses the case of Namibia to analyse the dialectical relationship between formal and informal oversight practices on the country’s intelligence service and its operations. This is done by showing how the gravity of the gap in formal oversight mechanisms on intelligence services has triggered oversight interest and activity in the informal public sphere, the latter of which is a subsidy of Namibia’s democratic atmosphere and affordances. The chapter highlights the structural incapacities in formal oversight mechanisms over the operations of the Namibia Central Intelligence Service, showing how these are mitigated by informal social actors such as the news media, civil society and political activists, among others. Nonetheless, the chapter acknowledges the importance of formal oversight as it comes with punitive authority unlike informal oversight activities which may be limited in terms of both their effectiveness and capacity to make the NCIS’s administration and operations truly transparent and accountable.
Downloads
Published
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

